Officials, legislators, and commentators weigh in on the latest Facebook controversy.
Salem Ghebremedhin
In light of the recent allegations made by Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, a former Facebook data scientist, National Public Radio of the United States (NPR org) emphasized critical points from her testimony.
NPR portrays Haugen as a reputable source and a "powerful critic" for a variety of reasons.
According to NPR, before leaving the social network, Haugen downloaded hundreds of pages of confidential documents and shared them with politicians, regulators, and The Wall Street Journal. These records prove that the company was aware of the harmful products it was selling to minors.
For instance, Haugen leaked one Facebook
study that found that 13.5% of U.K. teen girls say their suicidal thoughts
became more frequent after starting on Instagram. Another leaked study found
17% of teen girls say their eating disorders got worse after using
Instagram.
According to NPR, Haugen is not the first ex-Facebook employee to raise concerns, but she stands out because her testimony was personal and in-depth, and she came equipped with receipts to back up her story.
Other commentators have suggested that after the hearing Democrats and Republicans are unified in their desire to regulate Facebook.
According to Washington Post, at one
moment in the hearing, Republican Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas Turned to
democratic Sen. Blumenthal and said they should put aside their partisan
differences to tackle a common goal that is reining in Facebook.
To which Blumenthal said when it comes to
such regulations "Our differences are very minor."
"I share that View," Moral
replied.
Later during a press conference, Blumenthal
in refenced to the unity at the hearing said, "If you closed your eyes,
you wouldn't know if it was a republican or a democrat." "Every part
of the country has the harms that are inflicted by Facebook and
Instagram."
Aside from that, Hagans has called private citizens to
sue Facebook and other social media companies for the harm they caused by
their algorithms. However, lawmaker and legislative responses indicate that this might
be impossible. This is due to a decade-old law
known as section 230 immunizing social media companies from being sued over
wheat their users post but promised to examine possible carve-outs.
As of right now, however, federal
regulators and state prosecutors have not indicated how authorities plan to
respond.
At the same time, it is discouraging how slowly authorities and legislators are responding to the situation. After all, this isn't the first time Facebook has been involved in such a scandal.
Sources
Allyn, Bobby. Here are 4 key points from
the Facebook whistleblower's testimony on Capitol Hill. NPR, technology,
October 5, 2021.
Lima, Cristiano. American views on
regulating social media companies aren't as partisan as you may think. Washington
Post, Democracy Dies in Darkness, March 9, 2022.
When I watched the hearings, it was disappointing to hear Zuck getting easy questions from our senators. Not blaming them, as this tech is incredibly complicated, but some of the questions I heard were horrible from our extremely elderly senators. Can't wait to see hearings in something more complicated like AI or crypto
ReplyDeleteOne main problem I believe officials and legislators face when it comes to dealing out punishments and creating laws about technology is 1. they don't understand it, and 2. it is constantly changing, and due to these two factors the digital space is often a lawless place.
ReplyDeleteThis is definitely an issue that affects both sides of the political spectrum. Regarding the time that legislation is taking to move against the company however is rather complicated, this because of the complexity of not only the situation in terms of administrating fair punishment, but also the fact that the demand for a perfect algorithm is extremely difficult. These algorithms are still relatively young and not tasks that even the world's top programmers could perfect quickly making it seem almost unfair to seek quick punishment/action.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the comments about the officials and legislators. Some of the questions they asked Zuck came across as uninformed and ignorant. I think the legislators needed to be briefed better to allow for a better conversation in the hearing.
ReplyDelete-Daniela C